Communication driver

ABSTRACT

A circuit includes T sets of digital to analog converters (DACs), each including N current sources and M delay elements. An output signal includes a sum of outputs of the N current sources. An input of a first one of the M delay elements and a control input of a first one of the N current sources receive a respective one of a plurality of decoded signals. T sets of first converters each have a feedback node, an output, and an input that communicates with the output signal of a respective one of the T sets of DACs. T second converters have inputs that communicate with respective ones of the feedback nodes of each of the T sets of first converters. A summer generates a difference signal that is based on the outputs of the T sets of first converters and outputs of the T second converters.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/004,200, filed Dec. 20, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/432,886, filed May 12, 2006 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,312,739), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/178,350, filed Jul. 12, 2005 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,113,121), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/106,497, filed Apr. 15, 2005 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,095,348), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/972,143, filed Oct. 25, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,280,060), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/191,924, filed Jul. 8, 2002 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,844,837), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/920,241, filed Aug. 1, 2001 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,433,665), and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/737,474, filed Dec. 18, 2000 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,462,688), and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/972,143, filed Oct. 25, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,280,060), is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/737,743, filed Dec. 18, 2000 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,194,037), which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/206,409, filed May 23, 2000, and claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/211,571, filed Jun. 15, 2000 and said U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/972,143, filed Oct. 25, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,280,060), is continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/629,092, filed Jul. 31, 2000 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,775,529), the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to data communication. More particularly, the present invention relates to a Class B line driver for communication channels such as those present in an Ethernet network.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Digital-to-analog conversion involves the process of converting digital codes into a continuous range of analog signal levels (voltage or current), for example, as discussed in Chapter 31, “D/A and A/D Converters” of The Electrical Engineering Handbook, ed. Richard C. Dorf, CRC Press 1993, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. A digital-to-analog converter (hereinafter a DAC) is generally an electronic circuit that receives an n-bit codeword from an interface and generates an analog voltage or current that is proportional to the codeword.

One example of a DAC is discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,663,728, entitled A Digital-To-Analog Converter (DAC) and Method that set Waveform Rise and Fall Times to Produce an Analog Waveform that Approximates a Piecewise Linear Waveform to Reduce Spectral Distortion, issued on Sep. 2, 1997, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The DAC of the U.S. Pat. No. 5,663,728 patent employs a waveform shaping circuit to control the rise and fall times of each component waveform so that the analog waveform rising and falling edges settle to within a desired error bound of a linear output ramp.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,936,450, entitled A Waveshaping Circuit Using Digitally Controlled Weighted Current Summing, issued on Aug. 10, 1999, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference, discloses a waveshaping circuit. The waveshaping circuit of the U.S. Pat. No. 5,936,450 patent includes a controller and a current summing circuit controlled by the controller. The current summing circuitry selectively sinks combinations of component currents in response to a sequence of control signal sets to generate an output current signal having a desired waveform.

Many DACs attempt to generate desired signal waveform in response to a digital signal. For the purposes of this discussion, a signal output may include the output of a DAC and/or the output of one or more signal components within a DAC. For example, a signal component may correspond to an individual bit of a codeword. One conventional method generates a signal output with a slew rate controlled current source, as shown in FIG. 1. The voltage V measured across a resistor R is shown in FIG. 2. The waveform V includes sharp transition areas (e.g., corners) 1, 2 and 3, which may introduce electromagnetic interference. Such interference may inhibit accurate signal processing.

Another circuit which generates an output signal employs a current mirror 10 having an RC filter, as illustrated in FIG. 3. A current source I drives the current mirror 10. Current mirror 10 includes a first transistor 11 and a second transistor 12. Transistors 11 and 12 are preferably CMOS transistors. The first transistor 11 includes gate-to-drain feedback, and is coupled to transistors 12 through the RC filter. The RC filter limits rise and fall times of the input signal I. However, the R and C components are typically process and/or temperature dependent. Such dependence causes variation in the output waveform as shown in FIG. 4. The dashed lines in FIG. 4 represent arbitrary output responses due to temperature and/or process variation. A stable output signal is difficult to obtain with such a circuit.

Many older communications technologies employ bi-level signals, where each signal can have one of only two levels. However, newer communications technologies employ signals having many levels. One such technology, Gigabit Ethernet, employs signals having 17 levels. FIG. 5 depicts a D/A circuit capable of producing such multi-level signals. The D/A circuit of FIG. 5 employs a DAC 32, a low pass filter 34, an operational amplifier 36, a transistor 38, and a resistor 39. Each level of a multilevel input signal is provided to DAC 32 for conversion to an analog signal. The LPF34 then determines the rise time of the output of the DAC 32, and the output is passed to operational amplifier 36. This construction presents two problems. First, the R and C values of LPF 34 will vary with temperature and process variations, and the output signal will have a poor waveshape where the rise times are not constant. Second, since all input current is passed through the same DAC, and since bandwidth is a function of current level, each level of the multilevel signal will present a different rise time. This second problem is illustrated in FIG. 24.

FIG. 24 shows a waveform produced by the D/A circuit of FIG. 5 where DAC 32 has four levels. Because the bandwidth of the circuit is a function of the signal level provided to the non-inverting input of operational amplifier 36, the slew rate differs for each signal level. Referring to FIG. 24 for example, the bandwidth for the transition from the 0 signal level to the 1 signal level is low, resulting in a low slew rate and a long rise time t₁. In contrast, the bandwidth for the transition from the 2 signal level to the 3 signal level is high, resulting in a high slew rate and a short rise time t₂.

These signal processing problems are not adequately addressed in the art. Accordingly, there is a need for a current source to control an output signal which is independent of temperature and process considerations. There is also a need for a DAC to generate a signal having selectable transition areas (corners). There is a further need of a circuit to generate desirable waveshapes.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An Ethernet controller includes a decoder, and T sets of transmit circuits. Each set of transmit circuits receives one of T decoded signals from the decoder, and includes a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) that provides a transmit output signal, and a replica circuit that provides a replica output signal. Each DAC includes N current sources arranged in parallel and differentially, and M delay elements. Each current source includes a control input. A sum of outputs of the N current sources forms each transmit output signal. An input of the first delay element and the control input of the first current source receive a decoded signal. An input of an mth delay element is in communication with an output of an m-1th delay element. The output of each delay element controls a corresponding control input of a current source. A sum of the transmit output signals forms an accumulated output signal.

The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram of a conventional circuit, which includes a slew rate controlled current source.

FIG. 2 is a graphical depiction of a waveshape corresponding to an output of the FIG. 1 circuit.

FIG. 3 is a view of a conventional circuit including a current mirror having an RC filter.

FIG. 4 is a graphical depiction of a waveshape corresponding to an output of the FIG. 3 circuit.

FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a D/A circuit.

FIG. 6 is a graphical depiction of a waveshape having smooth transition areas.

FIG. 7 is a circuit diagram of a current source according to the present invention.

FIG. 8 is a graphical depiction of current components of the current source illustrated in FIG. 6.

FIG. 9 is a graphical depiction of a resultant output waveshape from the current source illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7.

FIG. 10 is a graphical depiction of a waveform template, and a waveshape that fits within the template.

FIG. 11 is a circuit diagram of a current source according to the present invention.

FIGS. 12 a-12 c are graphical depictions of waveshapes generated by the current source of FIG. 10.

FIG. 13 is a circuit diagram of a current source according to the present invention.

FIG. 14 is a circuit diagram of a current source having variable delay elements according to the present invention.

FIG. 15 a is a graphical depiction of a waveform generated with uniform delay elements.

FIG. 15 b is a graphical depiction of a waveform generated with non-uniform delay elements.

FIG. 16 is a circuit diagram of a current source including a plurality of differential transistor pairs according to the present invention.

FIG. 17 is a circuit diagram of an alternative embodiment according to the present invention.

FIG. 18 is a high-level schematic diagram illustrating a communication channel in connection with which the method and apparatus of the present invention may be used;

FIG. 19 is a detailed schematic diagram illustrating one embodiment of a transceiver according to the principles of the present invention; and

FIG. 20 is a detailed schematic diagram illustrating a second embodiment of a transceiver according to the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 21 is a detailed schematic diagram illustrating a third embodiment of a transceiver according to the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 22 shows detail of a DAC according to some implementations.

FIG. 23 is a detailed schematic diagram illustrating a fourth embodiment of a transceiver according to the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 24 shows a waveform produced by the D/A circuit of FIG. 5.

FIG. 25 shows a waveform produced by the circuit of FIG. 21.

FIG. 26 shows detail of a converter according to one implementation.

FIG. 27 is a detailed schematic diagram illustrating a fifth embodiment of a transceiver according to the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 28 shows detail of converter according to one implementation.

FIG. 29 shows detail of a DAC according to some implementations.

FIG. 30 is a functional block diagram of a transceiver;

FIG. 31 is a circuit diagram illustrating baseline correction to an active summer;

FIG. 32 is a circuit diagram illustrating error correction.

FIG. 33 is a circuit diagram illustrating a summer that receives a transmitter signal, a replica transmitter signal and an output of a voltage to current converter.

FIG. 34 is a circuit diagram illustrating a summer that receives a transmitter signal, a replica transmitter signal and an output of a charge pump.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention will be described with respect to circuits and methods for shaping waveforms, and in particular, to a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) employing such a waveshaping circuit. However, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the present invention is not limited to applications involving DACs, but also may be applied to other applications, such as signal processing, systems to control signal rise/fall time, signal storage, communications, etc. Moreover, while the present invention is particularly suited to applications in the read channel of a hard disk drive, many other applications will suggest themselves to persons of skill in the electrical engineering arts. Furthermore, the present invention is particularly suitable for use with the structure described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/737,743, entitled “Active Replica Transformer Hybrid,” filed concurrently herewith, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIG. 6 illustrates a desired signal output 20. The output waveform 20 includes smooth transition areas, which reduce noise such as electromagnetic interference. A preferred rise time (“T_(r)”) for a DAC is 3-5 nanoseconds (ns).

The present invention generates a signal to approximate the desired signal output 20 with a current source 30. As shown in FIG. 7, current source 30 includes a plurality of current sources. For example, current source 30 may include current sources I₁, I₂, I₃ and I₄. Current sources I₁, I₂, I₃ and I₄ each preferably generate a respective current I_(n), where n is 1, 2, 3 or so forth. The signals I_(n) are preferably equal in magnitude and form, and may include a signal delay. In the FIG. 7 example, current sources I_(n) each generate a linear ramp. For example, consider a signal I1, which includes a linearly rising edge starting at time t0. Current I2 mirrors current I1, except that I2 includes a linearly rising edge starting at time t0+Δt. The variable Δt represents an amount of delay time. Current I3 mirrors currents I1 and I2, except that current I3 includes a linearly rising edge starting at time t0+2Δt. Similarly, current I4 mirrors currents I1, I2, and I3, except that its linearly rising edge starts at time t0+3Δt. The relative waveform components for currents I₁, I₂, I₃ and I₄ are shown in FIG. 8.

Currents I₁, I₂, I₃ and I₄ are summed (or mixed) to produce a resultant waveform I0 as shown in FIG. 9. Waveform I0 approximates the desired output signal shown in FIG. 6. Like the desired output signal of FIG. 6, waveform I0 has many desirable properties. For example, I0 has selectable transition areas (corners). The transition areas can be smooth, or sharp, by selectively adjusting the length of Δt. Also, waveform I0 accommodates arbitrary rise/fall times.

The waveform I0 can also be adjusted by varying Δt to fit within specified requirements. For example, with reference to FIG. 10, waveform I0 can be adjusted to fit within a template 40, for example, as provided by the IEEE standard waveform shape. In this example, I0 has been optimized to produce low electromagnetic interference and to fit within the IEEE template 40.

The delay variable Δt is preferably controlled using a delay-locked loop or is controlled by reference to an external clock. As such, Δt can be precisely regulated. A waveform which is independent of temperature and/or process considerations can then be generated.

The generation of a linear ramp is explained with reference to FIGS. 11-13. A signal is produced from current source 50, which includes a plurality of current sources I1 through In. Each of the plurality of current sources generates a replica signal I. In this example, input signal I is preferably a square waveform. The signal I is delayed by At from each subsequent current source, after the initial current source I1. For example, I2 is delayed by Δt, and In is delayed by nΔt. The currents are summed (or mixed) in a known manner to produce an output which approximates a linear ramp.

With reference to FIG. 12 a, the signal components of the individual current sources are relatively illustrated. FIG. 12 b illustrates the resultant waveshape I0, which includes a stair-step pattern. A linear ramp, as shown in FIG. 12 c, is approximated as the length of the delay variable Δt is decreased.

A circuit diagram of the current source 50 is shown in FIG. 13. Current source 50 includes a plurality of transistor pairs 52-56, where pair 56 represents the nth transistor pair. With reference to FIG. 13, a current source 51 drives transistor pair 52. Transistor pair 52 includes a transistor 52 a communicating with a transistor 52 b. Transistor 52 a is preferably configured with gate-to-drain feedback. The gate of transistor 52 b is biased so as to operate in an “on” state. The gate/drain of transistor 52 a communicates with the gates of transistors 53 a, 54 a, 55 a and 56 a. The drains of transistors 53 a-56 a each communicates with an output Io. The gates of transistors 53 b-56 b each communicates with an input waveform Iin (e.g., a square signal), some through delay elements. For example, the gate of transistor 54 b communicates with waveform Iin through delay element d1. The gate of transistor 55 b communicates with waveform Iin through delay element d2 and delay element d1. Similarly, the gate of transistor 56 b communicates with waveform Iin through each of the delay elements d1 through dn. In the preferred embodiment, each of delay elements d1-dn delays the signal by Δ. Delay elements can be realized via known delay locked loops.

The operational aspects of FIG. 13 are now even further explained. Initially, waveform Iin is communicated to the gate of transistor 53 b, which turns on the transistor pair 53. A signal 11, which is proportional to the waveform Iin, is output at Io. Waveform Iin is also communicated to delay element d1, which delays the waveform by Δ seconds. After Δ seconds, delay element d1 communicates the delayed waveform to the gate of 54 b, which turns on the transistor pair 54. A signal I2, which is proportional to Iin, is output at Io. The resultant waveform Io includes the sum (or mixture) of signals I1 and I2. The input waveform Iin is respectively delayed before communicating with the gates of transistors 55 b and 56 b. Transistor pairs 55 and 56 are activated (e.g., turned on) and respectively supply current 13 and In, which are added to the resultant waveform I. The current source 50, as shown in FIG. 11, is therefore realized.

There are many advantages of the configurations shown in FIGS. 11 and 13. For example, individual current sources (e.g., In) can be turned on/off on demand, particularly since Vgs is large and constant. Also, the current source 50 will generally consume less power than the current mirror shown in FIG. 3, particularly since a current mirror typically employs a DC bias. An additional advantage is that with a small Iin, the VGS voltage is also small (e.g., close to the threshold voltage VT). In such a case, VGS-VT-VDS equals a small number of current sources with negative VDS.

A further current source 60 is shown in FIG. 14. The current source 60 is configured in the same manner as the current source 50 shown in FIG. 13, except that the delay elements may include variable delays. The same components with respect to FIG. 13 are labeled with their same reference numerals in FIG. 14. In the FIG. 14 embodiment, delay elements Δ are non-uniform throughout the circuit. For example, Δ may involve a longer delay than Δn−1, and so forth. Non-uniform delays may be employed to generate a smooth waveform. Multiple delay-locked-loops are preferably used to achieve different delay times.

To illustrate, an output waveform processed with uniform delay elements is shown in FIG. 15 a. Here a stair step waveform is produced, which may approximate a linear ramp, particularly as the variable Δ is decreased in length (e.g., time). In contrast, the amount of delay is varied with respect to individual delay elements as shown in FIG. 15 b. The approximated waveshape of FIG. 15 b is smooth (e.g., includes smooth transition areas) in comparison to the approximated linear waveshape of FIG. 15 b. Eight steps (or corresponding current sources) are employed in a preferred embodiment for a Gigabit channel. Of course, the number of levels may be varied according to need or design without deviating from the scope of the present invention.

A further embodiment of a current source is illustrated in FIG. 16. The illustrated current source 70 includes a plurality of differential transistor pairs 72-74, where 74 represents the nth differential transistor pair. A bias current I_(B) is supplied to the gate of transistors 72 c, 73 c and 74 c. An input waveform Iin is communicated to the gates of 72 a, 72 b, 73 a, 73 b, 74 a and 74 b. In the case of transistor pair 73 and 74, the input waveform Iin is delayed through delay elements d1 and d1+dn, respectively. Buffers B1-BN are optionally included in the circuit 70 to buffer the input signal lin. A differential output (Io+, Io−) is accordingly produced.

The advantages of the FIG. 16 current source include constant power dissipation. Also, the circuit provides matching capabilities, for example, for use in an Ethernet channel.

One drawback of the differential amplifier in FIG. 16 is that the differential amplifier is a Class A circuit which consumes unnecessary power even when no output is being transmitted. Moreover, a significant number of transistors is required to provide an adequately smoothed output current, thus requiring a large chip area. FIG. 17 depicts a schematic diagram of another embodiment according to the present invention which operates in Class B wherein one DAC is provided for each level of the multilevel input signal. DACs 42, 44, . . . 46 may be provided with corresponding LPFs 43, 45, 4 m. Preferably, a circuit according to FIG. 13 supplies each DAC with a control current to provide a stair step output which defines the rise time. In such an embodiment, since each DAC receives control current, and not input current, the transistors which supply each DAC may be smaller than those used in the FIG. 13 embodiment. Additionally, since the control signal determines the rise time of the output of each DAC, the LPFs merely produce a smoother output.

In FIG. 17, multilevel input signal D0, D1, . . . Dn is provided to the parallel DACs 42, 44, . . . 46. The number of DACs may be varied depending on the application. This embodiment solves two problems. First, by providing the FIG. 17 circuit with a staircase waveform, for example, from FIG. 14, an LPF merely smoothes the staircase waveform rather than defines rise time. Second, since the DACs are disposed in parallel, there will be no variations in rise time because each DAC has substantially the same current passing therethrough; that is there will be no bandwidth variation with resultant differences in rise time. The DACs may also be controlled by any appropriate circuitry, such as a decoder disposed prior to the DACs which would, in effect, select which DACs are activated by proper application of the input signals. In an alternative arrangement, a resistor ladder may supply the multilevel signal to the DACs of FIG. 17 rather than the transistors depicted in FIG. 13.

In communication transceivers, and particularly in Ethernet transceivers which are capable of transmitting and receiving data at 1000 megabits bits per second, communication is possible in a full-duplex mode. In other words, transmitting and receiving of data can occur simultaneously on a single communication channel. Implementation of such a full-duplex communication channel results in a composite signal (V_(TX)) being present across the output terminals of the transceiver, the composite signal V_(TX) having a differential transmission signal component and a differential receive signal component. In such a communication channel, the received signal (V_(RCV)) is derived by simply subtracting the transmitted signal (V_(T)) from the composite signal V_(TX) that is present at the transceiver output terminals. Hence, V_(RCV)=V_(TX)−V_(T).

This subtraction can be accomplished by generating a signal (referred to as a replica signal) which substantially replicates the transmitted signal, and canceling or subtracting the generated replica signal from the composite signal V_(TX) at the output terminals of the transceiver. However, the replica signal is generated as two single-ended voltages, such as V_(TXR+)and V_(TXR−), whereas the composite signal present at the output terminals of the transceiver is a differential signal. Consequently, in order to cancel the replica signal from the composite signal to thereby obtain the received signal, the two single-ended voltage signals must first be converted to a differential signal that can then be subtracted from the composite signal. This conversion, however, requires additional circuitry which adds to the cost and complexity of the transceiver.

While the present invention will be described with respect to an Ethernet controller for use in general purpose computers, printers, routers, etc. it is to be understood that the present invention may find applicability in other fields such as Internet communications, telecommunications, or any processor-to-processor applications using full-duplex communication.

Communication in an Ethernet computer network is illustrated in FIG. 18. As shown, an Ethernet communication channel 140 comprises a first Ethernet transceiver 142, a second Ethernet transceiver 144, and a two-wire interconnection 146 between the first Ethernet transceiver 142 and the second Ethernet transceiver 144. For example, the two-wire interconnection 146 may comprise a single twisted-pair of a Category 5 cable in accordance with IEEE gigabit transmission standard No. 802.3ab. As the Ethernet transceivers 142 and 144 may be substantially identical, only one of them is described herein.

The Ethernet transceiver 142 has a controlled current source 148, which is used to inject into the Ethernet transceiver 142 a control current I_(TX), which corresponds to a signal to be transmitted from the Ethernet transceiver 142 to the Ethernet transceiver 144. Ethernet transceiver 142 also has a termination resistance 150 and a first coil 152 of a center-tap transformer 154. The center-tap transformer 154 also has a second coil 156 coupled to the two-wire interconnection 146 to provide signals transmitted by the first Ethernet transceiver 142 to the second Ethernet transceiver 144. The center-tap transformer 154 serves to couple AC voltage signals between the Ethernet transceivers 142 and 144 while effectively decoupling the Ethernet transceiver 142 from the Ethernet transceiver 144 with respect to DC voltage signals. A pair of terminals 158, 160 is provided to measure a voltage V_(TX) present across the resistor 150 as a result of both signals transmitted by the Ethernet transceiver 142 and signals received by the Ethernet transceiver 142 from the Ethernet transceiver 144 via the two-wire interconnection 146. The voltage V_(TX) thus comprises a composite differential signal that includes a differential transmission signal component and a differential receive signal component.

As described in more detail below, the differential receive signal component of the composite differential signal V_(TX) is determined in accordance with the present invention by subtracting a replica of the differential transmission signal component from the composite differential signal V_(TX). In the illustrated embodiment, the Ethernet transceiver 142 includes the termination resistance 150, the center-tap transformer 154, and an integrated circuit 162 containing communications circuitry for implementing the functionality of the Ethernet transceiver 142.

An exemplary embodiment of such Ethernet transceiver communications circuitry is illustrated in the schematic of FIG. 19. As shown in FIG. 19, an integrated circuit 170 has a pair of output terminals 172, 174, which are coupled to terminals 76, 78, respectively, of the winding 152 of the center-tap transformer 154. Current in the winding 152 of the center-tap transformer 154 induces a proportional current in the secondary winding (not shown in FIG. 19) of the center-tap transformer 154, and that proportional current is communicated over the two-wire interconnection 146 (FIG. 18) to another Ethernet transceiver coupled thereto. Also coupled between the output terminals 172, 174 is a termination resistance 80, which, in the illustrated embodiment of FIG. 19, comprises a pair of termination resistors 82, 84. Preferably, the termination resistors 82, 84 have resistance values to substantially match the 100 ohm characteristic impedance of Category 5 cable in accordance with established standards for Ethernet connections.

The integrated circuit 170 also includes a transmission signal replicator 86 or other suitable circuitry for generating first and second single-ended replica transmission signals V_(TXR+) and V_(TXR−), which together substantially comprise a replica of the differential transmission component of the composite differential signal V_(TX). In the illustrated embodiment, the transmission signal replicator 86 comprises a pair of metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) transistors 88, 90.

The transistor 88 is coupled between the output terminal 172 and one end of a resistor 92, the other end of the resistor 92 being coupled to ground. Similarly, the transistor 90 is coupled between the output terminal 174 and one end of a resistor 94, the other end of which is coupled to ground. The gate of each transistor 88, 90 is coupled to and driven by the output of a respective operational amplifier 96, 98. The operational amplifier 96 has a non-inverting input 100 and an inverting input 102. The inverting input 102 of the operational amplifier 96 receives a feedback signal from the junction of the source of the transistor 88 and the resistor 92. Likewise, the operational amplifier 98 has a non-inverting input 104 and an inverting input 106, which receives a feedback signal from the junction of the source of the transistor 90 and the resistor 94.

A differential control voltage signal is applied between the non-inverting input 100 of the operational amplifier 96 and the non-inverting input 104 of the operational amplifier 98. This differential control voltage signal, when subjected to the voltage-to-current conversion brought about by the transmission signal replicator 86, provides the differential transmit signal component at the output terminals 172, 174. The feedback signal to the inverting input 102 of the operational amplifier 96 comprises a first single-ended replica transmit signal V_(TXR+), and the feedback signal to the inverting input 106 of the operational amplifier 98 comprises a second replica transmit signal V_(TXR−).

The single-ended replica transmit signals V_(TXR+) and V_(TXR−) are converted to a differential replica transmit signal by a converter circuit 107, which comprises respective differential operational amplifiers 108, 110, each provided with suitable input and feedback resistors, as shown in FIG. 19. The outputs of the differential operational amplifiers 108 and 110 are coupled to a differential active summer 112, which, in the embodiment of FIG. 19, comprises a differential operational amplifier 114 with feedback resistors 116, 118.

Because the differential operational amplifiers 108 and 110 introduce a delay into the replica transmissions signals V_(TXR+) and V_(TXR−), the composite differential signal V_(VT) is coupled to the differential active summer 112 through a further differential operational amplifier 120 arranged in a unity-gain configuration, with input resistors 122, 124, output resistors 126, 128, and feedback resistors 130, 132. This unity-gain operational amplifier simply provides a delay in the composite differential signal V_(TX) which preferably substantially matches the delay introduced in the replica transmission signals V_(TXR+) and V_(TXR−) by the operational amplifiers 108 and 110. As will be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the various input, output, and feedback resistance values associated with the operational amplifiers 108, 110, and 120 may be selected to ensure that these delays are substantially equal to one another.

An alternative embodiment of a communications circuit in accordance with the present invention is shown in the schematic diagram of FIG. 20. Because the transmission signal replicator 86 and the differential active summer 112 in the embodiment of FIG. 20 are identical to those in the embodiment of FIG. 19, the details of those sub-circuits are omitted from the description of the embodiment of FIG. 20. The embodiment of FIG. 20, however, differs from the embodiment of FIG. 19 in the structure of the sub-circuit provided for converting the single-ended replica transmission signals V_(TXR+) and V_(TXR−) into a differential replica transmission signal V_(TXR).

More particularly, as shown in FIG. 20, a converter circuit 240 is coupled to the transmission signal replicator 86 and to the differential active summer 112 to produce the differential replica transmission signal V_(TXR) from the single-ended replica transmission signals V_(TXR+) and V_(TXR−). Converter circuit 240 includes an operational amplifier 242, input resistors 244, feedback resistors 248, and output resistors 246. Just as in the embodiment of FIG. 19, the embodiment of FIG. 20 includes a unity-gain differential operational amplifier 150, which provides a delay in the differential composite signal V_(TX) to substantially match the delay introduced in the differential replica transmission signal V_(TXR) by the converter circuit 240. As will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art, the differential operational amplifier 150 is preferably provided with input, output, and feedback resistors having resistance values which give the differential operational amplifier 150 a unity-gain value. Accordingly, the differential active summer 112 receives as input the delayed differential composite signal V_(TX) and the delayed differential replica transmission signal V_(TXR) and subtracts the latter signal from the former to produce at an output of the differential active summer 112 a differential receive signal which comprises the composite differential signal minus the differential replica transmission signal and thus corresponds to the signal received by the transceiver 170.

The simplification of the converter circuit 240 in the embodiment of FIG. 20, compared to the converter circuit 107 in the embodiment of FIG. 19, is made possible by the fact that the single-ended replica transmission signals V_(TXR+) and V_(TXR−) produced by the transmission signal replicator 86 in the illustrated embodiment are characterized by the feature that when V_(TXR+) is asserted then V_(TXR−) is zero (or ground), and when V_(TXR−) is asserted then _(VTXR+) is zero (or ground). It is because the single-ended replica transmission signals V_(TXR+) and V_(TXR−) have this characteristic that the two differential operational amplifiers 108 and 110 of the converter circuit 107 in the embodiment of FIG. 19 can be replaced by the single differential operational amplifier 142 in the converter circuit 240 of the embodiment of FIG. 20.

This reduction in components in the converter circuit 240 provides not only substantial simplification of the integrated circuit 170 as a whole, but it also reduces the well-recognized manufacturing problem of component mismatch, such as between the two differential operational amplifiers 108 and 110 of the embodiment of FIG. 19, for example, and improves common-mode rejection, which, in turn, results in overall improved performance of the transceiver 142.

Another exemplary embodiment of Ethernet transceiver communications circuitry is illustrated in the schematic of FIG. 21. Referring to FIG. 21, integrated circuit 170 comprises m differential pairs of voltage-to-current converters (VCC) 113. In the preferred embodiment, each VCC 113 comprises a voltage buffer comprising an operational amplifier 36, a transistor 38, and a resistor 39. The inverting input of each operational amplifier 36 receives a feedback signal from a node 109 at the junction of the source of a transistor 38 and a resistor 39. The non-inverting input of each operational amplifier 36 receives a control signal generated by a control circuit (CC) 111 comprising a DAC 42 and an optional low-pass filter (LPF) 43 in response to a bit of a digital control signal D. An important feature is that DAC 42 determines the slew rate. In the preferred embodiment, LPF 43 can be implemented as a single-pole filter. Each VCC 113 generates a bi-level transmit signal component in response to the analog control signal. In a preferred embodiment for use with Gigabit Ethernet, integrated circuit 170 includes 8 differential pairs of VCCs, and so is capable of producing a 17-level signal.

The transmit signal components generated by VCCs 113 aa through 113 am are combined to provide a multi-level signal that forms a first polarity of differential transmit signal V_(T), which appears at terminals 172, 174 as a component of composite signal V_(TX). The transmit signal components generated by VCCs 113 ba through 113 bm are combined to provide a multi-level signal that forms a second polarity of signal V_(T). Composite signal V_(TX) is fed to a differential active summer 115, which can be implemented in a manner similar to summer 112 of FIG. 19. Summer 115 also receives replicas of the transmit signal components produced by each VCC 113.

One feature of the arrangement of FIG. 21 is that the transmit signal is free of the distortion shown in FIG. 24. FIG. 25 shows a waveform produced by the circuit of FIG. 21. Because each level of the transmit signal is generated independently by similar circuits, the slew rates are the same for each signal level. Consequently, as shown in FIG. 25, the rise time t for each signal level is the same.

Another feature of the arrangement of FIG. 21 is the provision of an accurate replica of the transmit signal components produced by the VCCs. In particular, referring to FIG. 21, the current that generates a replica of a transmit signal component at a node 109 is the very same current that generates the transmit signal component. Hence, the replica signal produced by a VCC 113 is unaffected by process and temperature variations, and so is a very accurate replica of the transmit signal component generated by that VCC 113. Further, because node 109 is a low-impedance node, the replica signal can be tapped at node 109 with very little disturbance to the transmit signal component.

For example VCC 113 am is paired with VCC 113 bm. Each VCC 113 in a differential pair provides a replica signal component to a converter 107, which can be implemented as shown in FIG. 19. For example, VCC 113 am and VCC 113 bm provide replica signal components to converter 107 m. Each converter produces a differential replica signal component based on the single-ended signals received from the VCCs 113, and provides the differential replica signal components to summer 115. Summer 115 obtains the received signal V_(RCV) by subtracting the differential replica signal components from the composite signal V_(TX) that is present at the transceiver output terminals.

FIG. 26 shows detail of a converter 107 a according to one implementation. The outputs of VCCs 113 aa and 113 ba are coupled through resistors 308 and 310 to a differential operational amplifier 302 having feedback resistors 304 and 306. The outputs of differential operational amplifier 302 are supplied to summer 115. The remaining converters 107 are similarly implemented and connected to summer 115.

Another exemplary embodiment of Ethernet transceiver communications circuitry is illustrated in the schematic of FIG. 27. The integrated circuit 170 of FIG. 27 differs from that of FIG. 21 in that a single converter 307 replaces the multiple converters 107 a through 107 m of FIG. 21.

FIG. 28 shows detail of converter 307 according to one implementation. The outputs of VCCs 113 aa through 113 am are coupled through resistors 408 a through 408 m to one input of a differential operational amplifier 402 having feedback resistors 404 and 406. The outputs of VCCs 113 ba through 113 bm are coupled through resistors 410 a through 410 m to the other input of differential operational amplifier 402. The outputs of differential operational amplifier 402 are supplied to summer 115.

FIG. 22 shows detail of a DAC 42 according to some implementations. Referring to FIG. 22, DAC 42 operates as described above for the current source 50 of FIG. 12. DAC 42 receives a bit D from decoder 166, and provides a control current Io to LPF 43. Current Io is a staircase waveform such as those discussed above with reference to FIGS. 15 a and 15 b. Because this control signal determines the rise time of the output of each DAC, the LPFs 43 produce a smoother output. This embodiment solves two problems. First, by providing the LPFs with a staircase waveform, the LPFs merely smooth the staircase waveform rather than define rise time. Second, because the DACs 42 are disposed in parallel, there are no variations in rise time because each DAC 42 has substantially the same current passing therethrough; that is, there is no bandwidth variation with resultant differences in rise time. The DACs 42 may also be controlled by any appropriate circuitry, such as a decoder disposed prior to the DACs which would, in effect, select which DACs are activated by proper application of the input signals. In other implementations each DAC 42 provides a single-step waveform to a LPF 43.

Thus each control circuit 111 (formed by a DAC 42 and a LPF 43) provides a ramp waveform to one of the voltage-to-current converters 113, thereby controlling the slew rates of the voltage-to-current converters. Controlling the slew rates in this manner reduces unwanted high-frequency components that would be generated with higher slew rates. Further, because the slew rates are similar for each of the voltage-to-current converters, the bandwidth of the multi-level transmit signal is not dependent on the value of the control signal, resulting in a signal with small and uniform distortion across signal levels.

FIG. 29 shows detail of a DAC 42 according to some implementations. DAC 42 includes a plurality of current sources 502 a, 502 b through 502 n, and a plurality of delay elements 504. Current source 502 a receives a bit D from decoder 166, and generates a current in response. Delay unit 504 a provides a delayed signal to a current source 502 b, which provides a delayed current, and so on. The sum of the currents are provided as current Io.

Another exemplary embodiment of Ethernet transceiver communications circuitry is illustrated in the schematic of FIG. 23. Referring to FIG. 23, integrated circuit 170 comprises m differential pairs of digital-to-analog converters (DAC) 190. Each DAC 190 provides a transmit signal component in response to a bit D of a digital control signal. The transmit signal components provided by DACs 190 aa through 190 am are combined to produce a first polarity of differential transmit signal V_(T), which appears at terminals 172, 174 as a component of composite signal V_(TX). Similarly, the transmit signal components provided by DACs 190 ba through 190 bm are combined to produce a second polarity of differential transmit signal V_(T). Signal V_(TX) is also fed to summer 117.

Summer 117 also receives a replica of the transmit signal components produced by DACs 190 a and 190 b. The replicas are produced by DACs 190 ca through 190 cm and DACs 190 da through 190 dm. Summer 117 subtracts the replica signal V_(TXR) from the composite signal V_(TX) to obtain the receive signal V_(RCV). In some implementations, each DAC 190 is implemented as shown in FIG. 22.

FIG. 30 is a block diagram illustrating principle components for one of the four channels in a preferred gigabit channel configuration for use in an Ethernet network. As illustrated in FIG. 4, a vertical dashed line divides analog and digital processing components. The analog components preferably include a transmitter (“XMTR”) 601, replica transmitter (“Replica XMTR”) 602, transmit canceller 603, baseline correction module 604, low pass filter (“LPF”) 605, analog-to-digital converter (“ADC”) 606, and phase-lock loop (“PLL”) 607.

Digital processing components preferably include a transmitter encoder 610, echo module 611, NEXT cancellers 612-614 to assist in removing echoes, synchronization module 615, FIR (Finite Impulse Response) equalizer 616 and a DFE (Decision Feedback Equalizer) 617 to equalize a receive signal, and a Viterbi module 618. The digital processing components also include baseline correction modules 619 and 620 to correct residual baseline wander. A timing recovery module 621, an error correction detector 622 (described in further detail below), and summing junction 623 are also shown.

Referring now to FIGS. 31 and 32, a circuit diagram illustrates baseline correction to an active summer; The baseline wander canceller 604 is preferably decision directed to minimize the error defined by the difference between the equalized value and it's sliced value, as discussed below.

FIG. 31 is a circuit diagram illustrating an active summer. Baseline wander current I_(bl) is also “summed” by the active resistive summer, as shown in FIG. 31, to correct baseline wander. Approximately ninety percent (90%) of all system baseline correction can be obtained through the active summer. The remaining baseline residual can be digitally corrected through an equalizer, for example. As will be appreciated, the FIG. 31 topology allows the current sources (I_(bl) and I_(cms)) to each have a fixed output voltage, thus, minimizing current deviation due to finite output resistance.

The baseline wander correction module 604 preferably corrects for baseline wander using a decision-directed method, such as a discrete integrator. The decision-directed method can be implemented with a known charge pump, where the pump sign (e.g., +1/-1) is determined digitally using an error between the equalized baseline signal (y_(k)) and a sliced baseline signal ({circumflex over (γ)}_(k)) as shown in FIG. 32. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the expected error value (e.g., E[e.sub.k]) is ideally driven to zero. The charge pump is preferably pumped up or down based on the error value. For example, a positive error implies that a negative value should be input into the charge pump. For a negative error, a positive value should be input into the charge pump. The charge pump preferably has at least two current settings to regulate I.sub.bl. Of course, a charge pump with many current settings could be used to obtain finer baseline correction control.

Referring now to FIGS. 33 and 34, a summer 700 that receives the transmitter and replica transmitter signals also receives an output of a voltage to current converter 702 and/or an output of a charge pump 704. Additional details can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,775,529, which was previously incorporated herein by reference.

The individual components shown in outline or designated by blocks in the attached drawings are all well-known in the arts, and their specific construction and operation are not critical to the operation or best mode for carrying out the invention.

While the present invention has been described with respect to what is presently considered to be the preferred embodiments, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. To the contrary, the invention covers various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The scope of the claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions. For example, the input signals for FIGS. 7, 11, 13, 14 and 16 may be varied to produce different output waveforms. Also, the linear ramp produced by the current source of FIGS. 11 and 13, may be even further processed by the current source of FIG. 7, to produce smooth transition areas. Such modifications are within the scope of the present invention. Also, whereas the illustrated transistors are preferably CMOS transistor, n-type or p-type transistors may also be employed with the present invention. 

1. A circuit comprising: T sets of digital to analog converters (DACs), each including: N current sources, wherein an output signal comprises a sum of outputs of said N current sources; and M delay elements, wherein an input of a first one of said M delay elements and a control input of a first one of said N current sources receive a respective one of a plurality of decoded signals, wherein an input of other ones of said M delay elements communicates with an output of preceding respective ones of said M delay elements, respectively, and wherein outputs of said other ones of said M delay elements control corresponding control inputs of said other ones of said N current sources; T sets of first converters each having a feedback node, an output and an input that communicates with said output signal of a respective one of said T sets of DACs; T second converters having inputs that communicate with respective ones of said feedback nodes of each of said T sets of first converters; and a summer that generates a difference signal that is based on said outputs of said T sets of first converters and outputs of said T second converters. 